reddit bitcoin china ban

)submitted by π Rendered by PID 12793 on app-281 at 2017-06-24 11:03:22.175318+00:00 running 3522178 country code: SG.Roger Ver, a self-described bitcoin evangelist who renounced his U.S.citizenship and lives in Japan, was recently banned from Reddit for referring to the bitcoin administrator Theymos by his real name, but soon had his account restored.His actions, and those of Reddit, have raised questions in the bitcoin community about how censorship decisions are made in community forums.Comments on Reddit indicated the banned post was up for 12 hours.Much of the Reddit discussion became mired in the debate between the two bitcoin subreddits, r/btc r/bitcoin, a conflict with roots in the bitcoin block size debate.The moderator who removed Ver’s post noted that he explained to Ver that the ProHashing thread, the original offending post, is considered doxing and that Ver understood this.Ver’s MemoryDealers site on Reddit was suspended.Ver posted that he went to Reddit headquarters in San Francisco and chatted with its CEO, Steve Huffman, about his situation.
“I’m sure that all the current suspension problems at Reddit are being caused by the traditional karma system, not because of shill posting on Reddit,” he wrote.“The traditional moderation that Reddit needs to work is not able to keep up with the demands of the growing clickfarm economy.” One post noted that Ver’s own moderator advised him to delete the post, advice he chose to ignore.Another post provided a link to a screenshot of an early comment by Ver confirming that he believed saying the name of u/theymos did not qualify as doxing.Someone else warned him that Reddit administrators may not see it this way.Another post included a screenshot of the link posted a week earlier by u/ProHashing, which has been banned from Reddit, presumably for doxing.The fact that Reddit reversed Ver’s suspension drew criticism: “Anyone else would have been banned on the spot for alleged doxing,” one post stated.“He doxed someone, funniest part is that someone else did it 1 day earlier and was banned for it,” a similar post noted.
“He thought the rules didn’t apply to him.” “He must have (think he has) friends at high Reddit places to be able to rescue him from a ban,” one post commented about Ver.ethereum voting example“Or he’s going to buy his way out.bitcoin chart phOr just leave it to even worse cronies.” A poster who said Ver should not have been banned claimed having been banned on Ver’s site for a week for doxing a friend of the moderator by citing a public court case that anyone could have seen; “at least Reddit doesn’t have double standards like Roger does.” One post claimed that Ver’s action was not doxing Theymos since a “cursory Google search will reveal his real name for you if you so desire to find out.ethereum sslHis identity is not a secret in any way.” Several posters criticized Ver for not apologizing for his action.cày bitcoin 2017
One noted that Ver “used to be Bitcoin Jesus.Last 3 years, gone off the rails.” Some speculated on the reason for Ver’s actions.One hypothesized that Ver was part of a group that tried to start r/btc, but it didn’t gain critical mass.bitcoin api in c#“The political war for control over bitcoin at a code level and at a social community level continues.” Also read: Evangelist Roger Ver wants a bitcoin ‘lovefest’ Several posts noted that censorship has been frequent on the r/btc subreddit.armory bitcoin downloadOne who recently unsubscribed from /r/btc noted censorship is one problem with the site, another being that it rehashes “the same unfounded salty shit day in and day out.” The censorship debate continues, demonstrating major conflict within the bitcoin community that shows little indication of resolution in the near future.
This is an archived post.You won't be able to vote or comment.I just asked some good friends in China and they all say it's just Zerohedge talking !%@ again.(self.Bitcoin)submitted by I mean I'm CEO of Vaultoro (the bitcoin allocated gold exchange) and it's nice that people are trading into a heap of gold to take profits off the table but I thought I would just let you all know what my bitcoin friends in china are saying.One mate who works for one of the largest bitcoin companies in china (bitbank) told me he was at the blockchain conference with many Chinese govt officials.He told me that if I want to get a feel of how they feel then to read this /chinese-govt-blockchain-conference/ Anyway just wanted to relay this info to my friends here on reddit.π Rendered by PID 12426 on app-234 at 2017-06-24 11:03:30.616136+00:00 running 3522178 country code: SG., one of the safer and primary ways that people trade Bitcoin on a peer-to-peer basis.According to user BashCo, the problem has been ongoing: “Refuse” may be a bit too strong of a word here.
I first messaged them about it five days ago on April 4th, plus one reminder on the weekend.Still no reply, but they are often very slow in responding.I’ll give them another couple days.Throughout the post, it is made evident that links to LocalBitcoins are not being posted.An r/Bitcoin moderator even attempts to whitelist posts with said links, but they still do not appear.The most are made by user Frankenmint, who is a moderator on r/Bitcoin.That s/he is the one making the complaint makes it evident that this was not a local decision.Ironically, r/LocalBitcoins appears to be just fine.That subreddit has less than 1,000 users compared to r/Bitcoin’s more than 100,000.” is not a link, but a word.Reddit has yet to respond to CCN’s request for comment.Reddit is not above a paternalist approach to its content moderation.When the “Pizzagate” conspiracy reached its fever-pitch last year, a ban of the subreddit and discussion of the topic was implemented sitewide.During the same period, CEO Steve Huffman publicly acknowledged having edited vitriolic posts directed at himself.
The affair raised the age-old “censorship on private property” discussion.Companies like Reddit have to make careful judgement recalls when dealing with freedom of speech issues.After a certain point, too little moderation can lower the perceived value of a community.Likewise, too much moderation can stifle adoption of a given platform.Subreddit’s themselves also struggle with this occasionally.The very reason that r/btc and r/Bitcoin exist simultaneously is that some users of r/Bitcoin felt their ideas were being unfairly overmoderated.All of this is to say that if Reddit had received multiple complaints from users, valid or otherwise, about being scammed on LocalBitcoins, or something of that nature, then it wouldn’t be surprising if this were the catalyst for Reddit placing a ban on links to LocalBitcoins, and we can hope the issue will be resolved.It could also be a co-ordinated effort by competitors like Paxful, but this seems unlikely because the Bitcoin world is one where such moves are frequently exposed and their actors are vilified in the extreme.