Designed for 24/7 Mining Operation.Pre-wired and fully tested before shipping” Quantity: 34 sold See feedback Please enter a quantity of $qty_dummy$ or less Please enter a quantity of 1 Purchases are limited to $qty_dummy$ per buyer Please enter quantity of 1 or more Please enter a lower number Choose quantity that is less than $qty_dummy1$ or equal to $qty_dummy$ You can only choose quantity that is equal to $qty_dummy$ See details See details about international shipping here.help icon for Shipping - opens a layer Items shipping internationally Sellers Buyers Visit eBay's page on international trade.Worldwide See exclusions help icon for Estimated delivery date - opens a layer Estimated delivery dates - opens in a new window or tab include seller's handling time, origin ZIP Code, destination ZIP Code and time of acceptance and will depend on shipping service selected and receipt of cleared payment - opens in a new window or tab.

Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods.Apply Now - opens in a new window or tab | See terms - opens in a new window or tab See payment details Any international shipping and import charges are paid in part to Pitney Bowes Inc.Learn More- opens in a new window or tab International shipping and import charges paid to Pitney Bowes Inc.Learn More- opens in a new window or tab Any international shipping and import charges are paid in part to Pitney Bowes Inc.Learn More- opens in a new window or tab International shipping paid to Pitney Bowes Inc.Learn More- opens in a new window or tab Any international shipping is paid in part to Pitney Bowes Inc.Learn More- opens in a new window or tab | See details | See details - opens in a new window or tab Get the item you ordered or get your money back.Covers your purchase price and original shipping.Home   »   Ethereum   »  to   Pakistan Rupee = 34508 Pakistan Rupee Currency Conversion Tables Ethereum   RupeeΞ 1₨ 34266Ξ 3₨ 102797Ξ 5₨ 171328Ξ 10₨ 342657Ξ 50₨ 1713285Ξ 100₨ 3426570Ξ 200₨ 6853140Ξ 500₨ 17132850Ξ 1000₨ 34265700Ξ 3000₨ 102797099Ξ 5000₨ 171328498₨34265.6996 per EthereumFri, 23 June, 2017 Rupee   Ethereum₨ 30000Ξ 0.88₨ 90000Ξ 2.63₨ 150000Ξ 4.38₨ 300000Ξ 8.76₨ 1500000Ξ 43.78₨ 3000000Ξ 87.55₨ 6000000Ξ 175₨ 15000000Ξ 438₨ 30000000Ξ 876₨ 90000000Ξ 2627₨ 150000000Ξ 4378Ξ0 per RupeeFri, 23 June, 2017 Today's Change Range of Change 0 0 DateExchange Rate24 Jun 171 ETH = 34,507.9195 PKR23 Jun 171 ETH = 33,918.9808 PKR22 Jun 171 ETH = 33,917.9200 PKR21 Jun 171 ETH = 36,751.7294 PKR20 Jun 171 ETH = 37,927.6481 PKR19 Jun 171 ETH = 37,161.8269 PKR18 Jun 171 ETH = 38,864.2246 PKR17 Jun 171 ETH = 35,865.3048 PKR16 Jun 171 ETH = 33,755.3933 PKR15 Jun 171 ETH = 36,471.8979 PKR14 Jun 171 ETH = 40,365.9414 PKR13 Jun 171 ETH = 40,610.7811 PKR12 Jun 171 ETH = 35,627.1538 PKR11 Jun 171 ETH = 34,353.4778 PKR10 Jun 171 ETH = 29,552.6406 PKR09 Jun 171 ETH = 27,507.4361 PKR08 Jun 171 ETH = 26,409.1950 PKR07 Jun 171 ETH = 27,561.0521 PKR06 Jun 171 ETH = 25,716.1421 PKR05 Jun 171 ETH = 25,573.9153 PKR04 Jun 171 ETH = 23,781.8415 PKR03 Jun 171 ETH = 23,258.4750 PKR02 Jun 171 ETH = 23,421.3046 PKR01 Jun 171 ETH = 23,640.4579 PKR31 May 171 ETH = 23,645.0648 PKR30 May 171 ETH = 20,343.1553 PKR29 May 171 ETH = 17,588.4543 PKR28 May 171 ETH = 16,812.0930 PKR27 May 171 ETH = 17,222.9806 PKR26 May 171 ETH = 18,615.7040 PKR Date: Bank Commission +/- 0%+/- 1%+/- 2% (Typical ATM rate)+/- 3% (Typical Credit Card rate)+/- 4%+/- 5% (Typical Kiosk rate) Currency Conversion Tables Ethereum   RupeeΞ 1₨ 34266Ξ 3₨ 102797Ξ 5₨ 171328Ξ 10₨ 342657Ξ 50₨ 1713285Ξ 100₨ 3426570Ξ 200₨ 6853140Ξ 500₨ 17132850Ξ 1000₨ 34265700Ξ 3000₨ 102797099Ξ 5000₨ 171328498₨34265.6996 per EthereumFri, 23 June, 2017 Rupee   Ethereum₨ 30000Ξ 0.88₨ 90000Ξ 2.63₨ 150000Ξ 4.38₨ 300000Ξ 8.76₨ 1500000Ξ 43.78₨ 3000000Ξ 87.55₨ 6000000Ξ 175₨ 15000000Ξ 438₨ 30000000Ξ 876₨ 90000000Ξ 2627₨ 150000000Ξ 4378Ξ0 per RupeeFri, 23 June, 2017

Power Supply AC connector is a C19 Type” Quantity: 14 sold See feedback Please enter a quantity of $qty_dummy$ or less Please enter a quantity of 1 Purchases are limited to $qty_dummy$ per buyer Please enter quantity of 1 or more Please enter a lower number Choose quantity that is less than $qty_dummy1$ or equal to $qty_dummy$ You can only choose quantity that is equal to $qty_dummy$ Add to cart Make Offer Resume making your offer, if the page does not update immediately.bitcoin preis startSee details See details about international shipping here.bitcoin купить qiwiWe’ve now seen several multi-million dollar crowdfundings done on a blockchain.litecoin hardware list wiki

Projects are raising money through the token model: selling the native token needed to use their corresponding networks (Ethereum’s ether, Augur’s Rep, IPFS’ Filecoin, and others).For the basics on how this token model works and why it’s powerful, you can read my introductory post.I’ll refer to these tokens as protocol tokens in this post — a more accurate name to what others and I have called “App Coins” in the past.When considering raising money through a token, a few common questions arise:I‘m going to share current approaches and then offer ideas on future approaches using increasingly decentralized, on-chain methods.In short: if your project has a network effect, yes.While tokens serve many functions, the biggest benefit to the token model is that it provides the economic incentives for your network to get off the ground and overcome the classic chicken and egg problem.seized bitcoin address

In other words, it gives all users of your app the ability to own a little piece of your network, incentivizing them to start using it at the start.This gives it a higher chance of success with a lot less capital needed.In some projects the network effect and token model is obvious.For example, the network effect of Uber is the growing network of riders and drivers.So the token model for a Decentralized Uber and dUberCoin is pretty straight forward: make dUberCoin the native token of the Decentralized Uber network and reward early riders and drivers with more of it at the start.Bitcoin was the first example of the token model: early miners could mine bitcoin of unclear value at the time — now worth ~$65,000 per block — using just a laptop.bitcoin kakoWhile that’s no longer possible, it attracted the initial miners needed to bootstrap the network.It may take a little work to think about what this would look like for your project.litecoin mining shop

My hunch is that a surprising percentage of current and future businesses fall into this category since most businesses rely on some kind of network effect.It’s important to recognize what the network (or networks!)within your project are.At the moment many “apps” are really a bundle of a few things.For example, a food delivery app like GrubHub is really a bundle of: a network of restaurants and consumers, another network of restaurant advertisers (for sponsored placement in the app) and consumers, and a thin end-user client “app” that sits on top of these networks.ethereum 240Each of these networks could have their own token.bitcoin copper coinIt’s also possible some tokens don’t fully encompass all elements or what feels like the full value of a project.bitcoin transactions stats

For example, Augur’s Rep token allows you to participate as an oracle to the prediction markets of the network and get compensated for it, but doesn’t take a cut of all transactions in the network.These underlying networks and their user interfaces will get unbundled and re-bundled.We will see a bunch of different interfaces to the same blockchain-based networks in the same way there were a bunch of different Twitter clients early on and there are a bunch of different Bitcoin/Ethereum wallets today.Similarly, we will probably see a bunch of different networks and their tokens under the hood of what feels like a single end-user “app”.WeChat is a great example of this: it has many different networks in one UI.There have been two major types of fundraising through protocol tokens:Pre-release sales have historically been most common and can be conducted in fiat, digital currency, or some combination.Examples include Ethereum (pre-sold ether for bitcoin), ZCash (pre-sold ZCash for fiat in a traditional equity fundraise from angel and institutional investors).

They occur when a project needs money to develop and test a protocol to get it off the ground.Importantly, this means the protocol’s native token also has not yet been created, so IOUs for those tokens are being sold, not the token itself.Post-release sales are increasingly common.While they can be conducted through a central escrow agent, they are increasingly being conducted through a smart contract on the Ethereum blockchain which accepts crypto and atomically pays out the new protocol token.A recent example is the FirstBlood project.They occur when a project has launched an initial version of their protocol and corresponding token and wants money to continue its development.The project can then use digital currency raised to fund the continued development of the project.Sales conducted on-chain through smart contracts couldn’t really be done before Ethereum, which is why they are a newer concept.I think this style will become the most common over time. has a simple tutorial on how to code one up.

You can also create your first basic token in 15 seconds using The Token Factory.Pre-release sales make sense: it’s hard work to get a well-thought-out and tested protocol off the ground.Just like a startup, funding is often needed to get to an initial release.However, there are problems with these pre-release sales: we’ve gone off the blockchain and there’s now an IOU for a token that doesn’t yet exist.We also now need some kind of legal entity to accept these initial investments (more on that later).A potential approach to get the early funding benefits of a pre-release sale with the reduced trust required in a post-release sale is as follows:This approach avoids the trusted/centralized “IOU” portion of pre-sales by giving token purchasers the token itself, even though the protocol is not yet complete.It obviously has its risks: projects funded this way could never come to fruition, like any early project.But the forces in the world from both sides are clear: developers want to be able to raise money to create new protocols and people want access to these new protocol tokens as early as possible.

The two will converge and stabilize in a way where developers and future users can fund projects to a minimum viable product more easily.Different approaches will make sense for different protocols.The current norm is setting aside 10–20% of the protocol tokens and selling the remaining 80–90%.A small portion of tokens set aside immediately goes to the core developers of the protocol to recognize their work to date, with the majority set aside to fund future work.This gives the project two sources of funding: the funds raised in the initial sale, and the ability to sell or disburse the tokens held back in the future.How these allocations work is evolving and taking ideas from traditional companies.An early example of this is ZCash, where there is a “Founder’s Reward” that looks like the 4 year vesting schedule you’d typically find in a startup.Whether or not these rough allocations make sense remains to be seen.A typical startup has the opposite structure: typically 20% (not 80–90%) of a project is sold in its first funding.And therein lies a key point in the early stages of protocol tokens.

We have yet to hit a situation where the combination of funds set aside in the initial sale and tokens held back have run out — yet.This is a close equivalent to running out of cash and the options pool in a typical company.Ethereum, for example, hasn’t hit this bump yet because 1) it’s young and 2) the price of ETH vs every fiat currency has, more or less, been on the rise, making the ETH the Ethereum Foundation set aside last longer.As a result, we’ve never seen the idea of multiple fundraises as is common with startups.Running out of funds for future development seems likely, as work on these protocols is never really “done”, although they may mature and change less over time.Some combination of three things will happen in the future as a result:As with most legal questions, it seems the answer is: it depends.This model is new and largely untested.The most important question is whether or not it will be considered a security under US securities law.Some approaches to the various properties of a token which make it feel more like a security (thus riskier) and others which make it feel less like a security (less risky).One example is is the amount of functionality of the token.

If the token is only a vehicle to pay out a portion of profits it feels more like a security.If it allows you to uniquely use and access a network with a specific utility it feels less like a security.Another factor is the marketing around a token.If it’s marketed as generating or even guaranteeing profit, it feels more like a security.If it is marketed as serving a specific utilitarian purpose, it feels less like a security.We are currently working on an simple legal framework to categorize the level of risk associated with different approaches along with top lawyers and industry groups like Coin Center.We hope to open source this framework in the next few weeks as part of our goal to advance the decentralized application ecosystem.This post will be updated at that time.Coin Center, a non-profit industry policy group, published a good longer form report on this in January.Most groups who have raised funds through a token sale create some kind of entity to handle the funds raised.The most common structure at the moment is setting up an (often Swiss) foundation.

This foundation has some governance, much like the corporate governance you’d see in a normal company, which determines both the initial and ongoing distribution of funds raised.This is what Ethereum has done, more or less.Many C corporations in the US are searching for a good structure at the moment.A simple answer here may ultimately be the best one: don’t create an entity at all.Allow the token holders to vote on the disbursement of the funds raised to develop the protocol in a decentralized governance style.To tie up a few of the ideas mentioned in this post, here’s what doing all of this on-chain without the need for a central controlling entity might look like:Contributors can be individuals or even a series of C Corps who have bank accounts to pay rent, salaries, and other costs, as long as funding decisions are done through decentralized voting or similar.This is the case with Maker DAO — they have a few small companies and a series of individuals who are funded by the community.

There is a risk personal liability enters where central liability fades here, but my gut is that lessens with reasonable decentralization.In all likelihood there will be some kind of core group making recommendations to the community which, if things are progressing reasonably, will be backed by the majority of token holders.This approach replaces the need for a central foundation, company, or entity with decentralized governance.As we’ve seen in Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other protocols, it’s early days for decentralized governance in the realm of software protocols and there will be a lot of hard work and learning to do.However, given the nature and goals of most decentralized protocols, this probably produces the best outcome for all involved long term.At GDAX we want to see new protocols and their tokens flourish.If you are interested in creating the place where tokens are accessed and exchanged in the future, apply to join us.Thanks to Alex Felix for supplying graphs and Martin Koppelman (Gnosis), Andy Milenius (Maker DAO), Will Warren, Brian Armstrong, Dan Romero, Jarrad Hope, Joey Krug (Augur), Chris Dixon, and many at Coinbase for contributing to the ideas in this post.I gave an early live presentation of this at the Silicon Valley Ethereum Meetup.These are ideas and should not constitute or substitute for legal advice.