litecoin network hashrate

Difficulty: Litecoin Difficulty: 255,206 Estimated Next Difficulty: Adjust time: Hashrate(?): 7,210 GH/s Block Generation Time(?): Updated: Chart Explained The difficulty.The estimated next difficulty.Average block generation time of 2016 blocks.Block generation time is also known as confirmation time.Average block generation time of 1008 blocks.If grey line less than blue line, The generation time is decreasing.The more grey line is lower than blue line, the faster generation time is decreasing.After 2016 blocks generated, Litecoin will adjust difficulty to estimated difficulty in order to keep the block generation time at 150 seconds.Difficulty History Date Difficulty Change Hash Rate Jun 24 2017 255,206 7,307 GH/s Jun 20 2017 271,188 7,765 GH/s Jun 17 2017 228,364 6,539 GH/s Jun 14 2017 230,315 6,595 GH/s Jun 11 2017 197,309 5,650 GH/s Jun 06 2017 252,311 7,224 GH/s Jun 03 2017 257,730 7,380 GH/s May 30 2017 241,458 6,914 GH/s May 27 2017 240,940 6,899 GH/s May 23 2017 241,295 6,909 GH/s May 20 2017 224,826 6,437 GH/s May 16 2017 232,424 6,655 GH/s May 13 2017 213,651 6,118 GH/s May 10 2017 189,979 5,440 GH/s May 07 2017 179,054 5,127 GH/s May 04 2017 163,669 4,686 GH/s May 01 2017 125,655 3,598 GH/s Apr 27 2017 146,318 4,190 GH/s Apr 24 2017 131,639 3,769 GH/s Apr 20 2017 132,016 3,780 GH/s Apr 18 2017 102,267 2,928 GH/s Apr 14 2017 93,016 2,663 GH/s Apr 11 2017 91,854 2,630 GH/s Apr 07 2017 102,136 2,924 GH/s Apr 04 2017 92,957 2,662 GH/s Apr 01 2017 87,421 2,503 GH/s Mar 28 2017 89,106 2,551 GH/s Mar 24 2017 94,375 2,702 GH/s Mar 21 2017 89,025 2,549 GH/s Mar 17 2017 93,785 2,685 GH/s Mar 14 2017 87,514 2,506 GH/s Mar 10 2017 88,482 2,534 GH/s Mar 07 2017 89,872 2,573 GH/s Mar 03 2017 98,387 2,817 GH/s Feb 28 2017 99,025 2,835 GH/s Feb 24 2017 92,302 2,643 GH/s Feb 21 2017 99,011 2,835 GH/s Feb 17 2017 95,184 2,725 GH/s Feb 14 2017 92,762 2,656 GH/s Feb 10 2017 98,674 2,825 GH/s Feb 07 2017 96,128 2,752 GH/s Feb 03 2017 102,399 2,932 GH/s Jan 31 2017 98,711 2,826 GH/s Jan 27 2017 99,114 2,838 GH/s Jan 24 2017 96,311 2,758 GH/s Jan 20 2017 95,319 2,729 GH/s Jan 17 2017 88,617 2,537 GH/s Jan 14 2017 83,632 2,395 GH/s Jan 10 2017 74,964 2,146 GH/s
Litecoin Hashrate historical chart Share:         1 liner log 3 months 6 months year all time Transactions Block Size Sent from addresses Difficulty Hashrate Price in USD Price in BTC Sent in USD Avg.Transaction Fee Median Transaction Fee Block Time Market Capitalization Avg.Transaction Value Median Transaction Value nodes Tweets Active Addresses Top100ToTotal   Raw Values Contact:  | Donations: BTC 13KPgojUhg2Rx92WRJQDZR7vy2vegonHsf  | Advertising  | Privacy Policy / Disclaimermapa bitcoin polskaAdvertise with us Litecoin Network Hashrate Chart and Graph Loading chart data...litecoin rehcBitcoin’s mining difficulty increased by 16.6 percent over the weekend, signaling that the network’s overall hash rate has also increased by a similar amount over the past two weeks.bitcoin raspberry pi node
The network’s total estimated hash rate has essentially doubled since the middle of October.A large chunk of this increase has taken place over the past month, where the hash rate has increased by more than 50 percent.The network hash rate is the total amount of computing power pointed at the Bitcoin network.Pools That Saw Their Share of Total Hashing Power IncreaseIt’s difficult to know where exactly this new hashing power is being deployed, but it is possible to see the differences in mining pools’ shares of the overall hash rate.When comparing the most recently completed difficulty period with a run of 2016 blocks from the middle of October, GBMiners is the pool that saw the largest amount of growth.bitcoin core forkGBMiners enjoyed an increase of 62 blocks compared to the total set of 2016 blocks from October.acquisto bitcoin italia
Recently, it was found that GBMiners is connected to a Ponzi scheme disguised as a bitcoin cloud mining operation in India.Since October, BTC.TOP has grown from nothing to roughly 3 percent of the network hash rate.Batpool also emerged during this period of time to grab a little over 1 percent of the network. Founder and CEO Jiang Zhuo’er is behind BTC.TOP and does not much care for Bitcoin Core’s Segregated Witness improvement.Both GBMiners and BTC.TOP signal support for Bitcoin Unlimited as opposed to Bitcoin Core.sukses dengan bitcoinBitcoin Unlimited is software that intends to replace Bitcoin’s 1 MB block size limit with the concept of emergent consensus.At this time, it is unclear if this new digital currency network would be a new version of Bitcoin or an altcoin.In terms of pools signaling for Bitcoin Core’s Segregated Witness improvement, Bitfury saw the largest amount of growth.The mining pool saw an increase of just under 3 percent between the middle of October and the most recently completed difficulty period.Pools That Saw Their Share of Total Hashing Power DecreaseIf the above mining pools are mining more blocks, then that means someone else must be mining fewer blocks.No miner saw a bigger drop in their share of the network since October than BTCC.
BTCC now mines about 35 percent less blocks than they did in October.No other pool came close to BTCC in terms of a loss in their share of the network hash rate, but ViaBTC and Slush Pool also saw notable declines., GoGreenLight and Kano CKPool all saw sizable declines.Hash Rate Continuing to IncreaseAlthough the last difficulty period saw a rather massive increase of 16.6 percent, it appears that hash rate is continuing to be added to the network.At 118 blocks into the current difficulty period, there has already been another estimated 15.25 percent increase in the network hash rate.Judging from the rapidly increasing hash rate, it appears multiple mining pools are receiving shipments of new hardware.While some predicted Bitcoin could crash and burn as a result of the halving event over the summer, the mining pools were correct in predicting a more positive outcome.As Bitcoin’s total hash rate increases, it becomes more difficult for a motivated adversary to pull off an effective attack on the network.