Looking for a historical chart of USD earned per Hash and per day (up to unit) (self.BitcoinMining)The head of a bitcoin mining pool that has emerged as a strong advocate for a bigger block size argued in a Reddit Q&A today that many in China's mining community support such a move.ViaBTC founder Haipo Yang took questions during an Ask Me Anything (AMA) session on the r/btc subreddit, commenting on the block size debate.The event saw strong advocacy for Bitcoin Unlimited, a bitcoin software implementation that has been proposed as an alternative to Bitcoin Core, the primary user client for the bitcoin network.ViaBTC was launched in June of this year (and quickly emerged as controversial).The AMA session came amid the ongoing rollout of Segregated Witness, a change to bitcoin's code aimed at increasing the amount of transactions the network can handle without adjusting the block size.Yet the upgrade has proven to be a controversial one among some bitcoin users, who have argued that an increase in the block size – or a variable size with Unlimited – is the better approach.

Yang claimed in the session that, as it stands, China’s mining community wants a bigger block size, but isn't unified in its support for Unlimited specifically."Most pools in China have lost their trust in Core and shifted their attention to Unlimited.I know a couple of pools said in private that they won't support [Segregated Witness] and will support Unlimited instead.The reason that they haven't shifted to BU is that they are waiting for a better chance and also a possible compromise from Core."Elsewhere, Yang framed the current debate as "a battle about Bitcoin’s future path", invoking bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto and arguing that Unlimited's approach is more in line with the initial vision of the digital currency.While the thread largely drew supporters, critics emerged.One notable inclusion was Blockstream CEO Adam Back, who wrote that Unlimited "is non-functional" and "little tested", among other critiques."I’ve already clearly stated my view: the protocol is more important than the code," Yang wrote in response.

"We've been running Bitcoin Unlimited for more than a month with no problems."The push for bigger blocks within China's mining community was also on display during a recent event hosted by bitcoin mining firm Bitmain.This development has largely continued despite the protests of Bitcoin Core and its supporters, who maintain alternatives would be dangerous if more widely used.The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is an independent media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies.bitcoin us dollar kursHave breaking news or a story tip to send to our journalists?weird bitcoin addressesContact us at [email protected]/* vps via bitcoin*/!function(t,e,r,n,c,a,p){try{t=document.currentScript||function(){for(t=document.getElementsByTagName('script'),e=t.length;e--;)if(t[e].getAttribute('data-cfhash'))return t[e]}();if(t&&(c=t.previousSibling)){p=t.parentNode;if(a=c.getAttribute('data-cfemail')){for(e='',r='0x'+a.substr(0,2)|0,n=2;a.length-n;n+=2)e+='%'+('0'+('0x'+a.substr(n,2)^r).toString(16)).slice(-2);p.replaceChild(document.createTextNode(decodeURIComponent(e)),c)}p.removeChild(t)}}catch(u){}}()/* ]]> */.ethereum nasdaq

I benchmarked Nicehash again today and it broke all my algorithms, anyone know why this is/know of a fix?Jump to: , Mining Team Reddit, shortened to MtRed or Mt.Red, was a mining pool for redditors.This pool paid out using a proportional share reward system (your shares / total shares for the round) = % share of the rewards.The service was opened in May, 2011.[1][Serious] Is it possible for a beginner programmer to play and test general Bitcoin code?etoro bitcoin tradingOr do I need to be a pro at C++ to even start?legit bitcoin poker22, 2016 at 11:50 EST: Bitcoin Magazine recieved a response from major Chinese Bitcoin exchange Huobi, which indicated that the situation was still evolving.miami international bitcoinAccording to Huobi, there was not yet consensus among the Chinese mining community about whether to run Bitcoin Classic or Bitcoin Core.bitcoin gnu

This contradicts the earlier information from F2Pool and HaoBTC indicating that a decision had been reached.“We all feel it's not appropriate for us to give comments at the moment because Evan Mo and other miners are still discussing this issue and haven't come to a consensus.We will continuously pay attention to this issue and make official comment on it when the time is right,” said a Huobi spokesperson in an emailed statement to Bitcoin Magazine.bitcoin etf impactShortly after the sensational public break-up between Bitcoin and R3CEV - hire Mike Hearn, and the launch of several alternative Bitcoin implementations, the block-size dispute is reaching fever pitch.Bitcoin Classic, in particular, has been gathering support among companies, users and some developers.Significantly, a number of mining pools has also publicly come out in support of the Bitcoin Core fork led by Jonathan Toomim.The second largest mining pool on the Bitcoin network, with some 23 percent of hashing power, China-based F2Pool, was said to be among the pools prepared to switch to Bitcoin Classic.

Yesterday, however, rumors started to surface claiming that the Chinese pools had changed position, and will stick with Bitcoin Core.Speaking to Bitcoin Magazine, F2Pool operator Wang Chun confirmed this is indeed the case.“The rumors are true,” Chun said.“Miners in China were scared by Luke Dashjr’s proof-of-work changing pull request.” The specific pull request Chun refers to was made by Bitcoin Core and Bitcoin LJR developer Luke Dashjr last week.Dashjr argued that a hard fork should be accompanied by a change of Bitcoin mining hashing algorithm, as it would render ASIC miners obsolete and could re-decentralize mining.Since Bitcoin Classic intends to democratize governance of the implementation, users could vote on the pull request; it had not received widespread support as of yet.The pull request itself, however, was quickly closed by Bitcoin Classic lead developer Jonathan Toomim, who considered the idea too radical.He argued it shouldn’t have been submitted to GitHub directly – but rather discussed on the voting page and Reddit.

Many Bitcoin Classic proponents believe that the pull request was a sabotage attempt against Bitcoin Classic.They reason that the proposal was specifically intended to strike fear into the hearts of the mining community; if the pull request were to be adopted, any investments made in mining hardware could quickly be made worthless.When Bitcoin Magazine spoke to Wang Chun earlier this week, the pool operator had already nuanced his position.F2Pool’s claimed support for Bitcoin Classic was misinterpreted, said Chun, stating: “We did not say we would ‘support’ Bitcoin Classic.We used the word ‘welcome,’ to be exact.” Earlier this week Chun did, however, emphasize that he wants the block size limit to be increased.Perhaps more important, Chun insists a hard fork is the desired solution to accomplish this – rather than a soft fork through Segregated Witness, as the Bitcoin Core development team intends.“At the Scaling Bitcoin workshop in Hong Kong, almost every one of us agreed that block size should be increased, and should be increased as a hard fork, as there was no soft fork solution back then,” Chun explained.

“Then, last minute, Segregated Witness was introduced.I admire Dr. Pieter Wuille’s brilliant hack to deploy it as a soft fork.But despite being brilliant, the soft fork Segregated Witness is still a hack.A hack is dirty.Such a technology would be better implemented as hard fork.” Chun has made a concrete hard fork proposal since – though the details of this proposal are not yet clear.A hard fork solution is regarded as a measure of last resort by the Bitcoin Core development team.With hard forks, all full nodes on the Bitcoin network need to change their software to the latest version or risk being “forked off” the network, with potential unforeseen consequences.Soft forks, considered safer by most Bitcoin Core developers as they only require miners to change their software, have been rolled out several times.But Chun, like the Bitcoin Classic development team, believes the Bitcoin network can grow more cleanly through a hard fork.“Since Segregated Witness will only allow for some 70 percent of added space, a 2-megabyte hard fork would allow for more headroom, which could end the debate for now.