Share 60 GH/s ASIC Bitcoin Miner - Single What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?2,784 Sabrent 13 Port High Speed USB 2.0 Hub with Power Adapter And 2 Control Switches (HB-U14P) 824 GekkoScience Asic Rev.2 Double chip 2-Pac Compac-2 USB Stick Bitcoin Miner 15gh/s+ (BM1384x2) Raspberry PI 3 Model B A1.2GHz 64-bit quad-core ARMv8 CPU, 1GB RAM 1,495 Product description This listing is for 1 Butterfly Labs ASIC miner.This miner is brand new and used for less than an hour, I just don't feel like waiting to make back my investment.These items work great, no return.Butterfly Labs has lifetime warranty for parts.Includes Butterfly labs PSU and all cables.Item ships with tracking and insurance.Product information Package Dimensions 13.7 x 10.6 x 8.8 inches Item Weight 8 pounds Shipping Weight 8 pounds Manufacturer Butterfly Labs ASIN B00FRU3618 Origin Made in USA Item model number Little Single 30 gh/s Customer Reviews 3.4 out of 5 stars Best Sellers Rank #225,825 in Electronics (See Top 100 in Electronics) October 10, 2013 Warranty & Support Product Warranty: For warranty information about this product, please click here Feedback If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?

Would you like to tell us about a lower price?See questions and answers 5 star55%4 star18%2 star9%1 star18%See all verified purchase reviewsTop Customer ReviewsWorks nice but very loud.Edit - Electricity SkyrocketWas once a good deal, but even for FREEbut it runs like clockwork.A quality product!Runs good but heat issuesI'd love to have about 15 more of these.undecidedI'm loathe to write a good review for anything that BFL made but I should ... Most Recent Customer ReviewsSearch Customer ReviewsOver the past month, many Bitcoin exchanges, startups and experts weighed in on the debate between Segregated Witness (SegWit) and Bitcoin Unlimited (BU) supporters.The main claim of SegWit supports is that nearly 60 percent of nodes within the Bitcoin network are supporting the activation of SegWit.According to 21 Inc’s Bitnodes, approximately 56 percent of all Bitcoin nodes are in support of Bitcoin Core 0.13.0 and the other two minor updates of Bitcoin Core which includes SegWit support on testnet.

CEO Roger Ver, claimed that Bitcoin miners are showing increasing support of SegWit.A chart called “Mining Pool Support by Proposal” provided by Coin Dance and shared by Ver, demonstrated that 17.3 percent of miners support BU while the other 16.67 percent supported the activation of SegWit.60 mh/s bitcoinSamson Mow, COO of the world’s longest running Bitcoin exchange BTCC, and Alistair Milne, Bitcoin investor at Atlanta Digital Currency Fund, expressed their support for SegWit stating that SegWit’s transaction malleability solution opens the door for Lightning, a micropayment solution, that is ultimately beneficial for the long-term growth of Bitcoin.bitcoin mining hourlyMilne further emphasized the majority support of Bitcoin nodes for SegWit, requesting Bitcoin miners to start listening to its users.wow ethereal mobs

In response, Gang Wu, HaoBTC CEO, offered his strong stance against SegWit, describing the Bitcoin Core development team’s efforts in pushing SegWit development instead of a 2MB hardfork which they previously agreed on at the Hong Kong consensus conference as a “betrayal” to the mining community.bitcoin inr live chartAlthough HaoBTC later published a follow-up statement to explain their neutral attitude towards BU and SegWit, the exchange firmly reaffirmed that it intends to support the Hong Kong agreement that the organization signed.peter taylor bitcoinIn mid last month, Bitcoin and security expert Andreas Antonopoulos published a blog post in response to Tuur Demeester’s article entitled “Bitcoin: digital gold or digital cash?bitcoin etf sec newsBoth.” In it, Antonopoulos stated that organizations or people that are objecting to Lightning are pushing for off-chain trusted third party custodial or centralized platforms based on trust.

Antonopoulos later acknowledged that he supports SegWit, not necessarily because of its scaling solution but because it provides opportunities for two-layer solutions like Lightning or TumbleBit to enter.“I'm for SegWit, not because of scaling, but because it offers solutions to many technical issues in Bitcoin,” said Antonopoulos.Still, Bitcoin developers like Lightning co-author Thaddeus Dryja firmly believe SegWit can be described as an efficient scaling solution, as it increases Bitcoin block size to at least 2.1MB.On testest, Dryja was able to find 3.7MB blocks, a size 3.7x larger than the current block size.“I have a script that will spam testnet and make 3.7MB blocks.It’s not an 800KB regular block with txids and output scripts, and a 2.9MB witness block with just a bunch of signatures.It’s a single block, that looks pretty much the same as old blocks with a few extra requirements, that’s 3.7MB,” said Dryja.While BU supporters including Ver and Justus Ranvier, lead architect at Stash Crypto, all believe that the elimination of transaction malleability and the entrance of two-layer solutions are necessary for the long-term growth of Bitcoin, they don’t believe SegWit is the best method of doing so.

“I think ending transaction malleability is great for Bitcoin.The current SegWit soft fork is just one of many many ways that transaction malleability can be ended, but there are many other proposals on the table that may work as well as, or even better than SegWit.” In response to Ver’s preference of other solutions, Alex Bergeron from Blockstream stated that other solutions like Tom Zander’s “Flexible Transactions” aren’t viable alternatives, as they aren’t backward compatible, received little to no peer review and aren’t technically sound.BTCC COO Samson Mow gave Cointelegraph a similar statement: “The Bitcoin Core contributors, the entire technical community, wallet developers, many mining pools and major exchanges all believe a SegWit soft-fork is the path forward to end transaction malleability and for a safe yet quick way to increase the block size.Flexible Transactions from BU is not even remotely an option as the concept has already been dismissed by the technical community, and more importantly, there is no functioning code available - it's vaporware.” The lack of peer review has also proven to be an issue for Bitcoin Unlimited, as the Bitcoin Unlimited team recently found buggy codes within the software.