Oh, how the winds have changed for ad-supported media.Over the past year, it’s become decidedly trendy to praise non-advertising business models.This week Ev Williams, a longtime advertising adherent, called online ads a “broken system.” Fred Wilson, a venture capitalist who has argued vociferously that news and opinion should be free, this week proposed a complicated micropayment model for Medium inspired by bitcoin.I’ve watched this rhetoric change with hope.There has never been a more important time to fix the broken business model of news.With the election and its aftermath, the news has become the news, and readers everywhere are rooting for quality.But everywhere I look, I see publishers paying lip service to more direct payment models without taking real action.And publishers—unwilling to embrace and prioritize subscriptions—are still serving advertisers over readers.Log in here Silicon Valley Women Tell of VC’s Unwanted Advances Why Uber’s Investors Ousted Travis Kalanick Snap Eyeing Maps in Battle for Location Uber’s Kalanick Out Travis Kalanick’s Power Dented but Not Gone Caldbeck Takes Leave of Absence From Binary What Apple’s HomePod Is Up Against How Uber’s Top Engineer Saved His Job No Longer the Underdog, Nvidia Now Has a Lot to Prove Uber’s Asian Rival Grab Speeds Up Expansion One More Lesson From the Downfall of Kalanick Pace of Tech IPOs Remains Muted Despite Strong Market The Information You Missed This Week The Information’s 411 — Where Does Uber Go from Here?

Perhaps that’s part of the issue.The incremental business model experiments, being billed as “unconventional” in digital media these days, are prevailing because anything else rocks the boat too much.Truly new models, which happen to be simple old ones, threaten incumbent financiers and executives.So, to those media leaders who want to truly fix the broken media business in 2017, I wish you the courage to ignore the “innovators” and become one yourself.bitcoin sdk for iosThere is The Outline, which drew some headlines for raising money.bitcoin dark wiki(I still don’t understand why raising money is more headline-worthy than making it.)top bitcoin exchanges by volumeGox has discovered 200,000 missing bitcoins in a wallet no longer in use, the troubled Bitcoin exchange announced Thursday, reducing the number of missing bitcoins from 850,000 to 650,000.bitcoin achat canada

"We believed there were no bitcoins left in old wallets, but found 199,999.99 bitcoins on March 7," Mt.Gox Chief Executive Officer Mark Karpeles said in a document (PDF) released Thursday.Gox said it reported the discovery to attorneys on March 8 and moved the newfound bitcoins to offline storage.Once one of the largest and most popular Bitcoin exchanges, Mt.Gox filed for bankruptcy protection last month, saying it had lost nearly 750,000 customer bitcoins, as well as 100,000 of the exchange's own bitcoins, as a result of a security lapse.recibir pagos bitcoinThe discovery of the overlooked bitcoins apparently occurred before hackers hijacked and defaced Karpeles' Reddit account and personal blog with charges of fraud.rbi on bitcoinHackers accused the exchange of secretly keeping some of the coins allegedly stolen in the fraudulent withdrawals and posted data allegedly lifted from Mt.bitcoin ether wallet

Gox servers they said backed up their claims.The data purportedly showed that 951,116 bitcoins had been deposited with the exchange, more than 100,000 more than Mt.Gox claimed to have lost.The troubled exchange suspended customer withdrawals on February 7, claiming a fundamental flaw existed in Bitcoin that affected all transactions.Soon afterward, the exchange shut down altogether.Gox later apologized for the issue and said it had developed a workaround that would allow it to resume service, customers are still unable to make withdrawals.buying bitcoin for darknetPilots have a new way to outfox youbitcoin difficulty next monthBitcoin is again drawing scrutiny following an apparent theft of $387 million in client funds from a Hong Kong exchange that trades in the virtual currency.Hong Kong police are reportedly investigating the disappearance of the money at MyCoin, which allowed users to buy and sell Bitcoin.

The company appears to have suspended its service.Calls to MyCoin could not be connected, while calls to its customer service line were not answered, according to Reuters.In wake of the incident, Hong Kong's central bank cautioned consumers against investing in virtual currencies."Authorities are fumbling around trying to regulate these things," said Steve H. Hanke, a professor of applied economics at The Johns Hopkins University and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute."Hong Kong has a very good, regulated banking system.It does not want the authorities in Beijing coming down on them hard because something happened in some Bitcoin exchange."But the latest cloud over Bitcoin, and the largest since the 2014 bankruptcy of Tokyo-based Mt.Gox exchange, has less to do with the pros and cons of using or investing in virtual currencies and more to do with an old-fashioned scam."Reports say this wasn't a traditional exchange that was hacked, like Mt.Gox, but instead a business that provided some sort of contract that promised you a return, and some are surmising MyCoin was really running a Ponzi scheme based on Bitcoins," said Reuben Grinberg, an attorney at Davis Polk & Wardwell who started writing about the digital currency in law school.

"Oftentimes with new technology, where regulators haven't clamped down yet, scammers or people with bad intentions come in and start harming investors," said Grinberg, who cited as example the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission action last year against Trendon Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and Trust, or BSCST, the online entity he created.Shavers, operating under the online name "Pirateat40," solicited investors in online chat rooms and on the Bitcoin Forum, an online forum dedicated to the ditigal currency.He promised up to 7 percent returns weekly based on his alleged trading of Bitcoin against the U.S.dollar, while in reality using new Bitcoins from BTCST investors to pay the supposed returns.Shavers and BTCST were fined more than $40 million for bilking investors of more than 700,000 Bitcoins from early 2011 to mid-2012."What this says is, no matter how slick the website is or what businesses say about themselves, consumers should be wary," Grinberg said."In the history of Bitcoin businesses, there's a large number that turned out to be not what they said."

Beyond the danger of fraud, Bitcoin prices are highly volatile, Grinberg said.Other risks stem from buying and storing the digital currency on a personal computer."If your computer is hacked, Bitcoins could be stolen in the same way as cash could be stolen from under your mattress.New encryption approaches help, but are not foolproof.Relying on a a business to hold your Bitcoins is not risk-free, either, as the business could be fraudulent or could be hacked.""This is one of the most risky asset classes you can be involved in," the attorney said.Despite the heightened regulatory attention on Bitcoin, a growing number businesses are accepting and trading the currency, while investors are also piling in."A lot of venture capitalists are getting involved, who think there a lot of great benefits to virtual currencies even if you have regulation," said Grinberg, citing one exchange, San Francisco-based Coinbase, which uses its regulation by a half a dozen or so states as a selling point.In addition to Coinbase, a second regulated exchange is in the works, fronted by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, two of the largest-known holders of Bitcoin currency.